Release 0.3.0 about fetch

[sbauer322]

Might also be a good moment to update the clojure version to something like 1.7.0 or 1.8.0 as that is where LightTable is heading.

[kenny-evitt]

@sbauer322 I get notifications for all of the LightTable org repos.

I can make a new release. Or maybe not? Light Table is pulling the release package from Clojars and I might need to get in touch with Chris to be able to push a new release. This repo doesn't have any releases or tags so the Clojars releases are probably being created manually. I'm also unsure where the versions 0.2.1 and 0.2.2 are – they're listed on Clojars but the version in this repo is 0.2.0, and there are no branches in the repo other than master. @ibdknox Any help you can provide about this?

We might need, or want, to replace this with something else if it's too much trouble getting this sorted out.

I think we should defer bumping the Clojure version, unless you've tested it and you're confident that it doesn't break anything.

[sbauer322]

@kenny-evitt the good news is that it looks like there was no real change since 0.2.0. Unless Clojar is lying, both 0.2.1 and 0.2.2 were minor changes to contributing.md.

As for the actual creation of the release, I believe it is just one command lein deploy clojars.

We'll definitely need to hear from @ibdknox, or maybe @cldwalker if he knows, regarding making a fetch release since LightTable and its projects should be community managed as this point.

I wouldn't be opposed to replacing fetch with something else, especially since fetch has no dedicated maintainer (and noir is essentially deprecated), but I feel updating LT to the latest Clojurescript takes the higher priority for now. We should hold off on updating fetch's clojure dep too, as a result.

[ibdknox]

Happy to add whoever wants to be on the fetch repo on Clojars - @kenny-evitt I couldn't find your name on there.

Looks like I had some changes that I hadn't pushed. They are now. Pretty sure Clojars is lying about the commits, but I tagged what was 0.2.2. In all honesty, you're probably better off just merging the tiny bit of fetch (which is already tiny) into LT itself.

[sbauer322]

Thanks for the info @ibdknox! I would recommend @kenny-evitt for the fetch repo on Clojars... If he is unavailable then perhaps @rundis or myself.

[ibdknox]

added @rundis and @sbauer322 on there :) Happy to add Kenny too, just need to know the name.

[sbauer322]

So fast! Thanks again!

[kenny-evitt]

@ibdknox I just registered on Clojars as "kenny-evitt". Thanks for your help with this!

[ibdknox]

Added. :)

On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 11:12 AM kenny-evitt [email protected]
wrote:

@ibdknox https://github.com/ibdknox I just registered on Clojars as
"kenny-evitt". Thanks for your help with this!

—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.

Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#18 (comment),
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAERlAn7s7vMuSHooMlLXs7yQ91NVHsDks5qoFAJgaJpZM4JwHMi
.

[sbauer322]

Version 0.3.0 has been released.