Mixin examples are wrong about middleclass

[kikito]

Thanks for reporting this. I've fixed the wiki (btw, I thought anyone could make fixes on the wiki - isn't that how wikis work?)

The last function was a class method, so it's signature didn't need "self" (class was self on this case). I've however renamed "class" to "theClass" so it follows my own naming conventions.

Regards!

[mebens]

I didn't want to edit without your permission, even though some of the errors were very obvious.

About the last function, I would expect it to work that way, but I don't think it does. Take a look at this from middleclass-extras' Indexable:

function Indexable:included(theClass) 

As you know, that's translated to:

function Indexable.included(self, theClass)

I've also tried using the included function without self, but it doesn't work. The second argument "theClass" is always the class in my usage.

[kikito]

For the record: you (or anyone else interested in helping me out with my doc) have my explicit permission to correct the wiki. Specially the obvious errors.

Regarding your comment about included - you are again right. I now remember changing it some time ago - there is an edge case on which it might be usefult to have that extra self reference. It's just so "edge" that I tend to forget about it.

So yes, it should be :included(theClass), not .included(theClass). You were absolutely right, thanks for your insight, and sorry about the confusion.

I've changed the mixin wiki page (again) in order to reflect this.

[mebens]

Alright, I'll remember that.

Yeah it does appear to be an "edge" case, because the mixin itself could be referred to by it's name as well.

No worries. :)