Deserialize without generic type-parameter but.. with.. Type parameter? about jil

[kevin-montrose]

This isn't a bad idea, I'll see if I can't slip it into a future release.

[joergbattermann]

Awesome, thanks Kevin! (assuming you meant "can" instead of "can't" ;) )

[dotjosh]

Is there a way to serialize and pass the type too? I have a collection of objects that are used as their base type, so the generic method isn't serializing any properties defined on the subclass because the type is inferred from the generic signature of JSON.Serialize().

[kevin-montrose]

@dotjosh JSON.SerializeDynamic(object, Options) probably does what you want there. There's a perf hit (since it has to inspect), but if none of your types are DLR-aware then it shouldn't be a big one.

[dotjosh]

Thank you - yeah I saw that, didn't realize it was applicable. I'll have
to test the performance. The primary reason I'm looking at the library
(over newtonsoft) is the perf..

On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 9:44 PM, kevin-montrose [email protected]
wrote:

@dotjosh https://github.com/dotjosh JSON.SerializeDynamic(object,
Options) probably does what you want there. There's a perf hit (since it
has to inspect), but if none of your types are DLR-aware then it shouldn't
be a big one.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#60 (comment).