JVB instance should be recognized by MUC_NICKNAME instead of USERNAME about jitsi-prom-exporter

[chaosbiber]

There are different methods to integrate other videobridge instances, but yes, I had the same problem. Quick hack:

diff --git a/exporter/main.go b/exporter/main.go
index f2c5287..0b6030c 100644
--- a/exporter/main.go
+++ b/exporter/main.go
@@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ func handlePresence(s xmpp.Sender, p stanza.Packet) {
        }

        if presence.Get(&Stats{}) && presence.Get(&User{}) {
-               var jvbJid string
+               // var jvbJid string
                var stats *Stats

                //check extensions
@@ -224,15 +224,15 @@ func handlePresence(s xmpp.Sender, p stanza.Packet) {
                        switch extension := e.(type) {
                        case *Stats:
                                stats = extension
-                       case *User:
+                               /*case *User:
                                for _, i := range extension.Items {
                                        jvbJid = i.Jid
-                               }
+                               }*/
                        }
                }

                //we want to keep track of jvbs across their reconnects of autoscaled sets
-               jvbCollector.Update(strings.Split(jvbJid, "@")[0], stats)
+               jvbCollector.Update(strings.Split(presence.From, "/")[1], stats)
        }
 }

[MiningPickaxe]

Yup, with the current setup the output switches between the two bridges, depending on which bridge just published its information. This is currently a deal breaker for multi-jvb jitsi meet installations