Coder Social home page Coder Social logo

Comments (12)

timja avatar timja commented on August 17, 2024 1

Possibly just put in the summary:

No test results found

?

A little bit wary of omitting but also could be a valid solution

from junit-plugin.

jglick avatar jglick commented on August 17, 2024

(I do not consider this particularly important, unless test failures are not reported either. Have not yet observed an unstable build to check.)

from junit-plugin.

mrginglymus avatar mrginglymus commented on August 17, 2024

I'm seeing test result counts on most runs except durable task and echarts. Currently stuck under toddler and wrangling GitHub's very limited app, so hard to see exactly what's gone on.

from junit-plugin.

mrginglymus avatar mrginglymus commented on August 17, 2024

image

from junit-plugin.

timja avatar timja commented on August 17, 2024

ah interesting, I expect this will trigger some failures: jenkinsci/bom#376

from junit-plugin.

mrginglymus avatar mrginglymus commented on August 17, 2024

đŸ’„

from junit-plugin.

jglick avatar jglick commented on August 17, 2024

So we do get details on failures; it is only the count which is missing on subsequent checks.

from junit-plugin.

mrginglymus avatar mrginglymus commented on August 17, 2024

Everything looks ok to me - iirc you don’t get a count when there’s a single failure, right? And the greens with no counts also didn’t have any tests.

That’s definitely something to improve though, to explicitly say ‘no tests found’ rather than not show a count

from junit-plugin.

jglick avatar jglick commented on August 17, 2024

the greens with no counts also didn’t have any tests

Ah, missed that in https://github.com/jenkinsci/bom/runs/1498880553 for example. (jenkinsci/bom#341 means that this was common, for plugins including no explicit tests.) Maybe better to just omit the check altogether if there were no tests (when allowEmptyResults: true)?

from junit-plugin.

mrginglymus avatar mrginglymus commented on August 17, 2024

Yes - I suppose once you’ve set that true you shouldn’t be surprised if you get no results :)

from junit-plugin.

mrginglymus avatar mrginglymus commented on August 17, 2024

That would be my preference but I’ve never used ‘allow empty results’ so can’t speak from experience.

Doesn’t seem worth adding another config...

from junit-plugin.

timja avatar timja commented on August 17, 2024

Doesn’t seem worth adding another config...

agree

from junit-plugin.

Related Issues (20)

Recommend Projects

  • React photo React

    A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.

  • Vue.js photo Vue.js

    🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.

  • Typescript photo Typescript

    TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.

  • TensorFlow photo TensorFlow

    An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone

  • Django photo Django

    The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

  • D3 photo D3

    Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉

Recommend Topics

  • javascript

    JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.

  • web

    Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.

  • server

    A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.

  • Machine learning

    Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.

  • Game

    Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.

Recommend Org

  • Facebook photo Facebook

    We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.

  • Microsoft photo Microsoft

    Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.

  • Google photo Google

    Google ❀ Open Source for everyone.

  • D3 photo D3

    Data-Driven Documents codes.