Make KtorClient private and depend on ApiClient in generated code about jellyfin-sdk-kotlin

[Maxr1998]

If you pass classes as parameters, you could define reified inline extension functions afterwards, like so:

import kotlin.reflect.KClass

interface ApiClient {
    fun <T: Any> get(clazz: KClass<T>): T
}

inline fun <reified T: Any> ApiClient.get(): T = get(T::class)

[nielsvanvelzen]

The reified fun's are not in the interface so we won't be able to use the interface in the generated API classes with that approach, besides. Ktor doesn't allow passing the return type as a class, they ONLY support reified types (not sure why they chose to do that..).

[Maxr1998]

You could import the extension function, or only support the extension functions (aka syntactic sugar) for consumers of the API. Also, if I'm not mistaken, reified actually means simply passing the class to the function as a parameter, hidden behind compiler magic.

[nielsvanvelzen]

I get your point but the problem is that Ktor doesn't support passing the class as a parameter. It requires a reified type send via generic (https://ktor.io/docs/response.html) but interfaces do not support it.

[nielsvanvelzen]

I'm thinking we might want to switch from Ktor to something more low-level (like okhttp). This would give us more control and reduce the libraries dependencies. Besides, we don't use most of the Ktor stuff. The biggest change would be to do the JSON serialization ourselves (using kotlinx of course).