Consider implementing additional data points about iobroker.unifi

[braindead1]

Please provide more information on which states to be implemented. As I don't own a UDM, please also provide the JSON showing the exact structure.

[kopierschnitte]

Speedtest results are already done.

I can't help with the alerts (no entries at this time) but the "Events" source looks like this:
[
[
{
"_id": "5ec69cb084f705038eb04ad5",
"user": "70:bc:(xxx)",
"ssid": "bwnetz",
"ap": "fc:ec:(xxx)",
"radio": "na",
"channel": "40",
"hostname": "ChrisSurfaceBook",
"key": "EVT_WU_Connected",
"subsystem": "wlan",
"site_id": "5d(xxx)",
"time": 1590074534215,
"datetime": "2020-05-21T15:22:14Z",
"msg": "User[70:bc:(xxx)] has connected to AP[fc:ec:(xxx)] with SSID "bwnetz" on "channel 40(na)""
},
... (many more events may follow / 3,000 in my case!)
]
]

I do think that the alerts might be worth to iinclude but unsure about the events. It might flood the database...

[braindead1]

Gettings alert messages into ioBroker is easy. But as you said, it might flood the database, especially because as of now users have to delete unneeded states on their own. Besides that users have to process the messages into a more readable form (e.g. for VIS), because the adapter will not take care of that.

What about only getting the number of errors into ioBroker? This would offer the possibility to see it and manually check it in the UniFi Controller?

[MC-1984]

@braindead1 I think only integrating the number of alerts is a very good idea. I would have checked the controller anyway and only need a notification. I assume most people will see it that way.

Thanks for your good work!

[MC-1984]

@kopierschnitte I have just updated to the newest github version. Thats all I have:

So no detailed speedtest results (upload/download speed).

[kopierschnitte]

Hmm, that's strange. After upgrading to Beta 5, the results appeared immediately. But you need to enable those new queries in the adapter settings!
If that doesn't work, maybe try refreshing the objects list?

[MC-1984]

Should there be more objects to activate?

Unfortunately, refreshing of object list and restart did not solve the problem.

[braindead1]

@MC-1984 Obviously not all states are selected. Otherwise health and subsystem would have another icon. The states you are missing are called xput_down and xput_up and are not part of speedtest due to the UniFi API.

[MC-1984]

Wer lesen kann ist klar im Vorteil...

Thats a little embarrassing... It works great!

[braindead1]

Thank you for the feedback. I'll close this issue.

[kopierschnitte]

@MC-1984 Hat mich aber auch erstmal 30min gekostet ;-)

[MC-1984]

@braindead1 As the xput_down and xput_up values result from the speedtest maybe it is more intuitive to put these values under the speedtest topic in the object selection?

[braindead1]

Should be fixed in latest releases