Some questions about the implementation about gfocal

[implus]

1. I think one possible problem is that you may try to call iou_target.detach() for weighting the regression loss. It is easy to conduct the experiment by referring to the codes in this repo.
2. In fact, the performances for "predicted score" and "calculated score" have no obvious differences in final performance. You can try either as you like.

[JyunYuLai]

Hi,
Thank you for your quick response.

1. I'm not sure if i understand your answer correctly. So in the FCOS experiment, we shouldn't normalize the regression loss by the iou target. The reason not to do this is because it may cause the initial training unstable ? please correct me if i'm wrong.
2. Okay, thank you so much. I will give it a try.

[implus]

1. We should normalize, but use a form like ``iou_target.detach()'' for normalizing as it contains predicted bounding box part which may introduce gradient propagation.

[JyunYuLai]

Hi,
Yes, i already weighted the regression loss by iou target as FCOS did. In my FCOS IOU-branch experiment, it doesn't work. As training started, the iou target values are small(close to zero), probably because the initial prediction in regression branch is nothing. And then the iou branch tend to predict all zero iou value and then the training just failed. Did you use any trick like increase regression loss scale at the beginning of training ?

[implus]

It is a bit strange. In our experiments, we do nothing like increase regression loss scale at the beginning of training, and we do not observe training failures as you describe.

[JyunYuLai]

Okay, thank you, so in your case, simply replace centerness branch to iou branch work, I will check my code if there is any problem.

[implus]

All right~

[chenxuheng1995]

I have the same question. When I replace the centerness target with the iou target, the regression loss and iou loss will all be zero. What's more, the giou loss cannot be calculated.

[implus]

You can simply run the code in this repo and carefully go through more details to check what is missing in your implementation.

[chenxuheng1995]

This is my label question. Thank you for your reply.