Bandwidth Gains about impact-crater-core

[dylan]

May also be a time to consider using something with a better track record on the networking side: https://github.com/faye/faye

[cha55son]

I have been googling around and I can't seem to find any definitive sources saying faye is better than socket.io.

That was a good link on bandwidth management. I will keep that in mind and will probably tweak the current implementation when I get the time. Along with shortening the event names and data, I would probably end up using the base128 encoding as it will be the least error-prone/easiest approach with decent payoff. What do you think?

[dylan]

It wasn't so much that one was better than another it was that socket.io has been known to leak under sustained loads.

Re encoding, if it's not too lossy, that sounds great.

On Dec 9, 2013, at 6:51 PM, Chason Choate [email protected] wrote:

I have been googling around and I can't seem to find any definitive sources saying faye is better than socket.io.

That was a good link on bandwidth management. I will keep that in mind and will probably tweak the current implementation when I get the time. Along with shortening the event names and data, I would probably end up using the base128 encoding as it will be the least error-prone/easiest approach with decent payoff. What do you think?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

[cha55son]

Faye seems easy enough so if I find sufficient evidence against socket.io regarding leaks/etc then it would make sense to switch.