crs-add/loan-status/repayment-type about iati-schemas

[davidmegginson]

Confirmed that crs-add/loan-status/repayment-type is not in the 1.03 proposed changes at https://docs.google.com/a/acclar.org/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AnWngmdQt3stdDcwRHJxaXgtLWVoY2N5VWt4ck1oeGc#gid=1

[davidmegginson]

Confirmed that crs-add/loan-status/repayment-type does appear in iati-activities-schema.xsd

[davidmegginson]

Passed to Bill for confirmation that this change was correct. Please confirm and close.

[bill-anderson]

No. I cannot confirm, it should be there.

In the proposed changes as per above gdoc we have crs-add\loan-terms\repayment-type\text()

crs-add/loan-status/repayment-type should be there and is (incorrectly) missing (apologies)

There is an associated codelist

[caprenter]

I'm still not clear.

Are we saying that both elements should be in the schema:
crs-add/loan-terms/repayment-type and
crs-add/loan-status/repayment-type
?

If so this is how what the schema WAS showing before, and that I thought might be a bug. @bill-anderson you are saying this was correct and NOT a bug? (If so how did @davidmegginson manage to get it into the schema if it wasn't in the documentation - it may not matter but !??!)

So @bill-anderson do we need to roll back the removal of this element which was done in 0fdda51
?

[bill-anderson]

Apologies !!!
I have totally not seen that one is loan-status and one is loan-terms

I can confirm that crs-add/loan-status/repayment-type should not be in the schema

(still can't believe how my eyes didn't see this)

[caprenter]

Great, so the fix is good. I'll close the issue