Introducing comments to the CV entries about mzqc

[mwalzer]

👍
So I guess this will be a thing of ongoing refinement: so should we suggest comments/changes in the respective original cv issue, new issue, PR or elsewhere?
Interesting though is to have an open thread for each cv term. Worry with this is it might get too long and confusing.

[mwalzer]

wiki might be another place, but it's bad for discussions.

[mwalzer]

This might actually help us some

1. present our terms as clear as possible for a #141 PR
2. our terms being mixed in with general MS terms, PEFF terms, etc. (after #141) it will help avoid misinterpretation in the future even more

gets a priority 👍 from me

[bittremieux]

As discussed recently, we don't want to overdo it and introduce unnecessary comments. However, we do want to include comments when they can help to clarify how to interpret metrics.

The first batch of terms proposed for inclusion into the PSI-MS-CV illustrates this perfectly. Although this remains an ongoing point of attention as we merge more terms into the PSI-MS-CV, I'll close this issue for now.