Persistent storage for MultiMap about hazelcast

[bacsog]

Please prioritize this.

[PaulWoods4422]

Just another vote for this issue - it's the only thing preventing me using this library.

[enesakar]

I will look when we can plan it earliest.

[miere]

MultiMap persistence would be really useful for me, too.

+1

[kgdinesh]

any progress on this?

[thxmasj]

3.1 was just released, without this feature as far as i can see. Any progress?

[Dretch]

MultiMap persistence would be really useful for me, too.

[krokicki]

Persistent distributed MultiMaps would be an amazing feature. It's the only thing I'm really missing in Hazelcast right now.

[rodolfodpk]

I'd like to build a robust distributed implementation of the interface that this class implements:

https://github.com/rodolfodpk/myeslib2/blob/master/myeslib2-stack1/src/main/java/org/myeslib/stack1/infra/dao/Stack1MemDao.java

and I would love to implement it with Hazelcast.

[rubenlara]

Any progress on this?

[thearchitect]

We really need this feature! Any ETA for it?

[stonecauldron]

A vote for this feature

[gerabarna]

+1

[krasnyt]

+1

[kgdinesh]

+1

[VlSomers]

+1

[donovankim]

+1

[zsuzsaszabo]

MultiMap persistence would be really useful for me, too.

+1