Fork CFFI about sel

[berchn]

I'm of the opinion that it would be better to modify cl-tree-sitter to not need the CFFI fork than to maintain our own.

[pfdietz]

If we're going to monkey with cffi, can we look into efficiency? I'm seeing as much as 75% of the time during a parse being spent in cffi interface code.

[eschulte]

If it's possible and reasonably easy to modify cl-tree-sitter so it can use the upstream cffi then I agree that definitely sounds preferable. I haven't looked at any of the cl-tree-sitter CFFI calls and don't know anything of the content of the CFFI fork used by cl-tree-sitter. I suspect death would be supportive as they don't seem excited about maintaining CFFI forks.

[berchn]

death/cl-tree-sitter#8
We've made some changes to make cl-tree-sitter work with stock CFFI.