Log output inconsistent with other glog implementations about glog

[sergiud]

The plan for exactly what? I do not understand what are you asking. Note that glog does not claim to provide (strict) compatibility to other libraries.

[gnoack]

Thank you for your answer!

The name "glog" made the impression to me that this was the C++ implementation of the "Google" log output format, as it is also implemented by the same-named implementation in Go¹, and in line with the Abseil.io logging implementation². (There is also one in Python³, but it is not a Google-released library.)

Spoken in practical terms, that means that the log files are created per program run (solving some aspects of log rotation), have a specific schema for their file name, and the log line format is standardized.

It is a surprise to me that you are not targeting compatibility with that, given that the library is hosted as "google/glog" on Github -- maybe this would be worth clarifying better in the README, possibly in coordination with the Abseil team, so that new users understand the differences better?

Footnotes

1. https://github.com/golang/glog ↩

2. from https://abseil.io/about/:

   Abseil is an open source collection of C++ libraries drawn from the most fundamental pieces of Google’s internal codebase. These libraries are the nuts-and-bolts that underpin almost everything Google runs.

   ↩

3. https://github.com/benley/python-glog ↩

[sergiud]

You are correct that google/glog indeed hosts the original implementation of glog now maintained by community. AFAIK Google abandoned the project in favor of logging implementation in Abseil. The log format, however, was never standardized or at least I'm not aware of such undertaking, which is why it was extended in glog over time to better fit the users' needs. I also believe it is very clear that Abseil log and glog are two different and independent projects (the former being a fork of the latter) and they will further diverge over time.

It is important to note that users can write their own prefix formatters in glog and restore the "original" prefix if necessary.

Given these circumstances, I'm not sure what exactly needs to be clarified. In case you have a specific idea in mind, you are welcome to submit a PR with corresponding changes.

[sergiud]

I'll close the issue since glog works as documented.