Allow to change "public" or "secret" state of existing gist. about gisto

[sanusart]

Seems not possible by API.
Suggestion: To notify user that all revisions will be lost, URL of gist will change, comments will be lost and then to re-create a gist as new with all data and delete the old one.

[morsdyce]

Maybe we should just drop it?

As this isn't supported on github website as well, the only purpose between
public and secret is how you share it.
Secret gist can only send the link around instead of searching for public
gists using github website.

What do you think?

On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 12:34 AM, Sasha Khamkov [email protected]:

Seems not possible by API.
Suggestion: To notify user that all revisions will be lost, URL of gist
will change, comments will be lost and then to re-create a gist as new with
all data and delete the old one.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/38#issuecomment-20578000
.

[sanusart]

And what about scenario where I want one of my gists to not be public anymore?

On Jul 8, 2013, at 12:37 AM, Maayan Glikser [email protected] wrote:

Maybe we should just drop it?

As this isn't supported on github website as well, the only purpose between
public and secret is how you share it.
Secret gist can only send the link around instead of searching for public
gists using github website.

What do you think?

On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 12:34 AM, Sasha Khamkov [email protected]:

Seems not possible by API.
Suggestion: To notify user that all revisions will be lost, URL of gist
will change, comments will be lost and then to re-create a gist as new with
all data and delete the old one.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/38#issuecomment-20578000
.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

[morsdyce]

I think it's a rather rare use case but I guess someone could use it.

On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 12:41 AM, Sasha Khamkov [email protected]:

And what about scenario where I want one of my gists to not be public
anymore?

On Jul 8, 2013, at 12:37 AM, Maayan Glikser [email protected]
wrote:

Maybe we should just drop it?

As this isn't supported on github website as well, the only purpose
between
public and secret is how you share it.
Secret gist can only send the link around instead of searching for
public
gists using github website.

What do you think?

On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 12:34 AM, Sasha Khamkov [email protected]:

Seems not possible by API.
Suggestion: To notify user that all revisions will be lost, URL of
gist
will change, comments will be lost and then to re-create a gist as new
with
all data and delete the old one.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<
https://github.com/Gisto/Gisto/issues/38#issuecomment-20578000>
.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/38#issuecomment-20578108
.

[danijeljw]

So, there's no way to change a Gist from being Public to Private, and vice-versa, is that correct?

[morsdyce]

No, we will have to recreate the gist itself.
On 6 Oct 2013 08:37, "Danijel J" [email protected] wrote:

So, there's no way to change a Gist from being Public to Private, and
vice-versa, is that correct?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/38#issuecomment-25762754
.

[sanusart]

The only way as it seems now is to recreate the gist with opposed access permissions. In such scenario the stars, revisions and comments of this gist will be lost.
Star can be recreated instantly, revisions and comments cannot.
We plan to implement this feature with user warned that gist will loose comments and revisions.

On Oct 6, 2013, at 8:37 AM, Danijel J [email protected] wrote:

So, there's no way to change a Gist from being Public to Private, and vice-versa, is that correct?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

[ilyaevseev]

Still actual (at least for me)

[sanusart]

You can do it by pressing on the lock icon besides the title of the gist you are in.