License? about cpp_demangle

[fitzgen]

It is currently dual licensed as either MIT or Apache 2.0. I would be happy to tri-license it with GPL as well (assuming that is even possible?) if @jimblandy is OK with that as well.

Also, I just realized we only have the license info in Cargo.toml and should probably add their text to the repo properly.

[emaste]

It's already GPL compatible, so I don't see that triple-licensing it brings any real benefit.

[binarycrusader]

Thanks for fixing this, I just saw the blog post today and was excited about using this for a new project, but can't until the license gets formally added. I'd strongly recommend a copyright notice on each file that references a LICENSE.txt in the root of your project. Thanks!

(BTW, for the record, MIT/Apache 2.0 greatly appreciated.)

[fitzgen]

It's already GPL compatible, so I don't see that triple-licensing it brings any real benefit.

It isn't 100% clear to me either, other than potential political reasons for some project wanting to only use GPL (even though MIT should be linkable) perhaps. @fithisux, could expand here?

That said, if it's helpful, I'm happy to do it.