Add warning to [ls]dateTimeFormat() to inform about the mask usage about cfdocs

[pfreitag]

Thanks for pointing this out... do you know off hand if this applies to dateFormat as well?

[mjhagen]

I don't think it does, while testing it I originally couldn't reproduce and noticed I was testing dateFormat() instead of dateTimeFormat().

[pfreitag]

Thanks - will be interesting to see if Adobe has an opinion on it how it should work.

[shawnoden]

I tested a few of the date functions that take a mask. dateAdd() and datePart() don't see a difference in "y" or "Y". dateFormat() doesn't change with "y" or "Y" but does change with "s" and "S". timeFormat() reads "s" and "S" as the same mask, but sees "d" and "D" different. Though since both of those are only supposed to deal with their respective date parts, I guess I can't complain too much. However, dateTimeFormat() does see differences in "d" and "D", "y" and "Y" (as stated), "h" and "H", and "k" and "K". I haven't dug much further into CF date masking, but I may need to. This may be one of those things that I forgot I knew, but being in SQL land so long, I've gotten used to somewhat sensible date masks.

[shawnoden]

Oh, and Lucee can get very odd with date masking.

http://trycf.com/gist/0521ba783c8d220bc888/lucee?theme=monokai

Didn't Y'Y'Y'Y used to be old pre-MX behavior?