sic/operations: Image thresholding about sic

[MustafaSalih1993]

Do you have an idea which kind of tresholding you would like to add? 😄

Actually I have no idea, I read it generally and got only the idea 😥🤣

It might be that some are already implemented by third party libraries we import. For example, Otsu thresholding

oh interesting I'll check it out, and do more research 😅

[foresterre]

Take all the time you need; there's no rush or deadline from my side 😄. Have fun!

[foresterre]

I would be happy to add it!
Do you have an idea which kind of tresholding you would like to add? 😄

It might be that some are already implemented by third party libraries we import. For example, Otsu thresholding has been implemented by imageproc which is available from the sic_image_engine crate. Don't let that hold you back though; I would be happy to add thresholding whether you use an already implemented technique, or want to do it yourself!

[MustafaSalih1993]

Update: Mind blowing! i made a little research and found many kinds of thresholding and mind blowing for cameras etc.. I'm happy i searched for that i learned a lot!
i guess the idea i had was not great calculate intensity and then threshold the pixel
also i checked imageproc implementation it's nice but i saw that it's optional crate,
now i have 2 options:

1. Implement it manually.
2. make the operation optional since if i used imageproc ex: draw_text.rs file.

what will be the best option? I'm OK with both

[foresterre]

If you would want to add Otsu thresholding I would go with the implementation in imageproc. Note that, while it's marked as optional, it's also included by default (because frankly, the crate size doesn't add that much, and drawing text is quite useful).

I'm not sure if there are other thresholding methods included in imageproc, so others may require implementing it manually anyways.

That said, if you think you want to go for the maximum learning experience (and fun 😄) or you want to improve on the implementation in imageproc (e.g. speed wise), you can go for implementing it manually.

[MustafaSalih1993]

Sorry for the late response, work don't give me much free time 😅 ,
i guess I'll use imageproc's implementation since there's no point to implement it again and i have no idea about optimizing it 😅 , i will leave my manual implementation locally for learning only,
ill request a review by today or tomorrow
thank you