Internal functions in package index about bayesiantools

[florianhartig]

Can you have a look if there is an option to suppress this?

[stefan-paul]

According to the documentation only functions with the
export label should be exported.
But I'll have another look!

[stefan-paul]

Done with b9d8bc4 .
Just commented out all the roxygen commands for the not-exported functions.
However, I still think that this is somewhat strange. According to the roxygen docs we
did it the right way, so the functions should not have appared in the namespace....

[florianhartig]

This seems to be a known problem

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/41411044/need-to-document-arguments-in-functions-which-are-not-exported-in-r-package

In this one Ben also suggests to use normal comments as we have it now. This here

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/15892761/do-not-show-function-help-document-in-building-r-package-by-roxygen2

states that

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/15892761/do-not-show-function-help-document-in-building-r-package-by-roxygen2

helps - can you check this out, just to know?

[stefan-paul]

Ok. I'll have a look tomorrow.

[stefan-paul]

Just checked. The '@Keywords internal' version creates a help page which can be accessed
with ?foo. However, the funtion itself does not show in the namespace.
Regular # instead of the roxygen #' don't create a help page and the
function is not exported in the namespace.
I would tend to use the latter version to truly keep the functions internal.
@florianhartig what's your opinion?

[florianhartig]

yes, I agree! Done.