Problems when attempting to use a Proxy about posh-gvm

[flofreud]

First of all: thank you for the contribution. Could you please provide your changes as a Github Pull-Request? The changes would be easier to track and it would also be easier to integrate. Currently my time to invest into posh-gvm is greatly limited.

[santidhammo]

I can surely do that.
Op 15 nov. 2015 16:25 schreef "Florian Freudenberg" <
[email protected]>:

First of all: thank you for the contribution. Could you please provide
your changes as a Github Pull-Request? The changes would be easier to track
and it would also be easier to integrate. Currently my time to invest into
posh-gvm is greatly limited.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#8 (comment).

[flofreud]

Great! :)

Sjoerd van Leent [email protected] schrieb am Sa., 21. Nov. 2015,
14:54:

I can surely do that.
Op 15 nov. 2015 16:25 schreef "Florian Freudenberg" <
[email protected]>:

First of all: thank you for the contribution. Could you please provide
your changes as a Github Pull-Request? The changes would be easier to
track
and it would also be easier to integrate. Currently my time to invest
into
posh-gvm is greatly limited.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#8 (comment).

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#8 (comment).

[nmaynes]

Did this request ever get merged?

[flofreud]

The pull-request #9 is still open due to the open points discussed there. I hadn't the time to make the necessary changes myself.

Furthermore I still have to do #7 and have to see if I implement the proxy support in this old gvm version or in the new SDKMAN version.

Is this a blocker for you? I could try to find some time this evening and merge it if I'm sure not to break more than this solve ;)

[nmaynes]

This is not a show stopper for me. Focusing on the SDKMAN version is
probably wisest. If you need help with particular issues I am happy to
offer assistance.

On Fri, Jan 29, 2016, 7:04 AM Florian Freudenberg [email protected]
wrote:

The pull-request #9 #9 is
still open due to the open points discussed there. I hadn't the time to
make the necessary changes myself.

Furthermore I still have to do #7
#7 and have to see if I
implement the proxy support in this old gvm version or in the new SDKMAN
version.

Is this a blocker for you? I could try to find some time this evening and
merge it if I'm sure not to break more than this solve ;)

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#8 (comment).

[santidhammo]

It is still a show-stopper at my location. Though if there would be an
option to tell the downloader to use a different github source, it would
also remediate the problem for now.

Met vriendelijke groet,
Sjoerd

2016-01-29 17:56 GMT+01:00 Nathan M [email protected]:

This is not a show stopper for me. Focusing on the SDKMAN version is
probably wisest. If you need help with particular issues I am happy to
offer assistance.

On Fri, Jan 29, 2016, 7:04 AM Florian Freudenberg <
[email protected]>
wrote:

The pull-request #9 #9 is
still open due to the open points discussed there. I hadn't the time to
make the necessary changes myself.

Furthermore I still have to do #7
#7 and have to see if I
implement the proxy support in this old gvm version or in the new SDKMAN
version.

Is this a blocker for you? I could try to find some time this evening and
merge it if I'm sure not to break more than this solve ;)

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#8 (comment).

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#8 (comment).