Voided Docs pair keep unvoid about medici

[jraede]

I'm not sure I understand the issue - can you clarify?

[arqlz]

If an entry (erroneous one) is voided, a copy is made with contrary values so it is neutralised. And The first one voided property is turn to true. But the new negative one (The one madre to neutralice The wrong transacción) voided property value keep as false. So if you could not filter wrong transactions from the resto.

[jraede]

So do you need a flag to designate if a transaction was created in order to neutralize a voided transaction? Can't you just look to see if a transaction has an _original_journal property, which would mean that it was created in order to void a transaction in another journal entry?

[arqlz]

Not what i was thinking about, but thanks, it works for me

[muenzel]

When I void an journal entry then the transactions are marked as voided but the journal entry is not.

Both the transaction as well as the journal entry have the 'approved' and 'voided' flags, but it seems that the voided flag from the journal is not used at all (or am I missing something)

[koresar]

Thank you for the contribution. I'll take a look on Monday. Do you have time to wait few days?

…

On 2 Mar. 2018 23:17, "Harald Münzel" ***@***.***> wrote: When I void an journal entry then the transactions are marked as voided but the journal entry is not. Both the transaction as well as the journal entry have the 'approved' and 'voided' flags, but it seems that the voided flag from the journal is not used at all (or am I missing something) — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#2 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABjCLzV7EUhu3u3y-p0WMc7Pioc4tB5xks5taThlgaJpZM4DNe41> .