Metropolis Plan Discussion about pm

[pirapira]

@Souptacular does it make sense to add "yellowpaper" as a client in the chart?

[romanman]

you have double Parity there

[Souptacular]

Thanks Roman!

[obscuren]

go-ethereum metropolis progress

[kumavis]

@Souptacular not "ethereumjs-lib" just "ethereumjs"

[kumavis]

Note: The EIPs listed in the chart are not necessarily approved for Metro via the EIP acceptance process, but we want to get estimates as early as possible.

@Souptacular as possible it would be great to have the EIPs ordered by likelyhood of them being included in the next feature fork

[Souptacular]

That's a great idea. I currently do not have enough knowledge of the EIPs and their discussion history to make that call. It would be great if someone else could.

@obscuren, @chriseth, @vbuterin, @gavofyork: If any of you have time to quickly put a comment with what you consider to be the most likely to be implemented EIPs I can reorder the chart.

[Nashatyrev]

ethereum/EIPs#166 : why do we need another replay protection?

[Souptacular]

@Nashatyrev Please ask in the the EIP Issue page for #166 and tag @vbuterin

[Souptacular]

The chart has been updated to correct some inaccurate potential EIPs.

[mrstormlars]

What about delaying the diff.bomb and eventually decrease inflation (EIP#186/#189)? The Eth-community should have a possibility to vote on this.

[tawaren]

Is their any plan to include a byte code / EVM versioning scheme like #154 in Metropolis?