Interactive Range Rings about distance-direction-addin-dotnet

[jmccausland]

@dhagens did you address this?

@pshowalter what do you feel would be good to do here? Replace label in the this to read "Radius" or just don't update it?

[dhagens]

First I've seen this issue. I must have placed the wrong issue number in with my commit. I can make the change though.

[jmccausland]

@dhagens just verifying your tag, we'll take care of the issue when there is enough direction to move forward with it

[jmccausland]

@pshowalter Changed label when in interactive mode to reflect distance as Radius, please verify and close

[pshowalter]

Verified: Changed label when in interactive mode to reflect distance as Radius.

[pshowalter]

I think the changing of the Label is fine.

A distance delta from the previous ring might be needed in some workflows, however, this was not a function in previous version of “MA”.

From: Joseph McCausland [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, March 25, 2016 8:49 AM
To: ArcGIS/distance-direction-addin-dotnet [email protected]
Cc: Patrick Showalter [email protected]
Subject: Re: [distance-direction-addin-dotnet] Interactive Range Rings (#89)

@dhagenshttps://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_dhagens&d=CwMCaQ&c=n6-cguzQvX_tUIrZOS_4Og&r=6BG_IlrzjbGAOIlLCA5vdO8l1NJVfhbWnuChxtu_d88&m=0Zvx5Tck4qWPFCZlnFjjAdBhTdmamuwu9HIg-8nDdiU&s=trtqsL5UfPdlmyNur-lRyx1xhIkO_kFOX7PlbUMKY-c&e= did you address this?

@pshowalterhttps://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_pshowalter&d=CwMCaQ&c=n6-cguzQvX_tUIrZOS_4Og&r=6BG_IlrzjbGAOIlLCA5vdO8l1NJVfhbWnuChxtu_d88&m=0Zvx5Tck4qWPFCZlnFjjAdBhTdmamuwu9HIg-8nDdiU&s=_PyYtlRc8zpraugSi9owdZViPRJ3WRoHca4DwwGnEGc&e= what do you feel would be good to do here? Replace label in the this to read "Radius" or just don't update it?

—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_ArcGIS_distance-2Ddirection-2Daddin-2Ddotnet_issues_89-23issuecomment-2D201266975&d=CwMCaQ&c=n6-cguzQvX_tUIrZOS_4Og&r=6BG_IlrzjbGAOIlLCA5vdO8l1NJVfhbWnuChxtu_d88&m=0Zvx5Tck4qWPFCZlnFjjAdBhTdmamuwu9HIg-8nDdiU&s=DL5rQfxJLDpACugKRaYe2jKaB8bhRc_TIbsXsCb05Gs&e=