Improve data visualization in registry section about publicgoods-scripts

[lacabra]

Thanks @Rolikasi, I absolutely love it, thanks for your very detailed explanation, I very much appreciate your time to explain it so clearly. I am in full support of changing this visualization!

Are you still thinking of leaving the hovering in place? because I agree with you that is not needed if it fits within the rectangles above, but it is still useful to know where rectangles overlap (say how many nominees are labeled both software and data?)

[edil-it-them]

@lacabra, I'm happy to help!
I agree that hovering is useful and we need to leave it in place.

[lacabra]

@Rolikasi I would love for you to cross this off your list in the coming month. I've given it some thought and realize that there is one more constraint that you should be aware off. The current display of software, data, content and standard is incomplete because we have a fifth type: ai model. This potentially creates a major issue, which is the impossibility of displaying an intersection between 5 sets given 4-side square figures, though I claim that there will never be one single DPG that can be all of 5 types at once. The most common overlap right now is between software, data and content which is a 3-way overlap, when we introduce ai model I think that will overlap with data and software, possibly with content.