Eligibility is not as simple as all YES about publicgoods-scripts

[rachita19082]

Based on the information provided in the Digital Public Goods Standard, I suggest the following for the eligibility form.

1. Is it relevant to one of the Sustainable Development Goals?
Yes Correct Answer
No Not eligible

2. Does it use an appropriate open license?
Yes Correct Answer
No Not eligible

3. Is ownership clearly defined
Yes Correct Answer
No Not eligible

4. Does the license of libraries/dependencies undermine the openess of the project?
Yes Maybe eligible IF they are able to demonstrate independence from closed components
No Correct Answer

5. Is there documentation?
Yes Correct Answer
No Not eligible

6. Does this project collect or use non-personally identifiable information (non-PII) data?
Yes Maybe eligibile IF there is a mechanism for extracting non-PII data from the system in a non-proprietary format
No Correct Answer

7. Does the project adhere to privacy and other applicable international and domestic laws?
Yes Correct Answer
No Not eligible

8. Does the project adhere to standards and best practices?
Yes Correct Answer
No Not eligible

9. Does the project take steps to anticipate, prevent and do no harm?
Yes Correct Answer
No Not eligible

@lacabra @nathanbaleeta @amreenp7 Please provide your feedback on this.

[amreenp7]

@rachita19082 - this looks good to me. Per our conversation, let's look at the following scenarios:

• If 9/9 correct completely -> Page A (You are eligible)
• If 1 wrong completely and no maybes --> Page B (You are not eligible)
• If 1 wrong completely and at least 1 maybe --> Page B (Include a "Furthermore" for the maybe question)
• If none wrong and at least 1 maybe --> Page C (You may be eligible...furthermore section)