Is "MergedMiningHeader missing from parent coinbase" a correct consensus rule? about libdohj

[rnicoll]

I think that's snuck in when I replaced our AuxPoW code (from UnitedScryptCoin) with Namecoin's implementation. The original test matches between the two implementations: https://github.com/dogecoin/dogecoin/blob/v1.8.2/src/auxpow.cpp#L52 - so 1.10 is slightly more tolerant of the block header format. Sorry about that everyone.

I'll get libdohj updated to match 1.10, as the dominant implementation right now.

[rnicoll]

Should be fixed in 89cf3c6, could you check and close this if you're happy please.

[JeremyRand]

Thanks, I'll test this later today and see if it works.

[JeremyRand]

Namecoin now syncs to 100% with no issues, so looks like this is fixed (at least in the case of the specific auxpow coinbases found in the Namecoin blockchain). Thanks for the quick fix.