anti-xml for Scala 2.10 about anti-xml

[ritschwumm]

+1
and maybe include the fix for #67 which afaik happened after 0.3

[seglo]

I would also like to see this happen.

EDIT: From what I've seen anti-xml looks like a solid implementation, but it seems my only available option in a 2.10 project is to use the scala.xml library.

[oolekk]

+1 :)

On 26/03/13 21:42, seglo wrote:

I would also like to see this happen.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#92 (comment).

[jcranky]

+1
Although the project seems to be almost abandoned right now...

[nafg]

+100

[fancellu]

Me too. It looks nice but there's no way anyone can use it unless it gets brought up to 2.10

I see 31 forks! Any worth using for 2.10? Any devs on this project care to respond? Thanks.

[ktoso]

any plans about 2.10+ with this @djspiewak? :-)

[metasim]

Any reliable forks taking this over?

[TomTriple]

+1 - what needs to be done in order to use your fantasic library in 2.10?

[nafg]

What kind of compiler errors are there?

On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 2:44 AM, Thomas Höfer [email protected]:

+1 - what needs to be done in order to use your fantasic library in 2.10?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/92#issuecomment-29785420
.