Contribution from Italian workgroup on geotechnical BIM about schema-dev

[AC107]

We would love to have any assistance you can provide. We have a gitHub site for diggs that we are encouraging folks to use. Post suggestions. Questions etc or tools that will help grow DIGGS use. Does the DMT structure cover all you may need? Any suggestions or expansions? Are there other in situ tests that you could review in the scheme Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36>

…

________________________________ From: Jack Mazzoni <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2019 9:45:51 AM To: DIGGSml/diggs-schema Cc: Subscribed Subject: Re: [DIGGSml/diggs-schema] Contribution from Italian workgroup on geotechnical BIM (#7) Just noticed DMT is already embedded. Again, great job! Some other way we could help? Best Giacomo — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#7 (comment)>, or mute the thread<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AZI-CZSyT9n4fSUOUzUZ24aZXnMhvtgnks5vOWsfgaJpZM4a_l8D>.

[jackmazzoni]

We are currently reviewing the 2.5 schema implementing CPT tests, mainly involving QGIS + PostgreSQL. We'll now try with DMT as well.

As anticipated with Robert, we are also preparing a proposal for DIGGS (and AGS for the sake of political correctness) implementation within the National standard for BIM (UNI 11337).

I'm huge fan of DIGGS and will do my best to emphasize the positive aspects of it, especially in terms of data format (xml over csv) and scalability. In doing so I'd love to add something to the project. As my firm has quite an expertise in "light" geophysics, I might propose some way to store and share factual data for, say, MASW, HVSR, electric resistivity tomography... Or maybe some clever way to store and share geotechnical monitoring data (e.g. general purpose accelerometers).

Thank you in advance for your support and for your effort so far!

[jackmazzoni]

Just noticed DMT is already embedded. Again, great job! Some other way we could help?

Best
Giacomo

[AC107]

Jack, can you send me some contact information directly so I can add you to a DIGGS contact list? [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> — Allen Cadden / Principal From: Jack Mazzoni <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2019 9:42 AM To: DIGGSml/diggs-schema <[email protected]> Cc: Subscribed <[email protected]> Subject: [DIGGSml/diggs-schema] Contribution from Italian workgroup on geotechnical BIM (#7) Great job so far! I'm currently leading an Italian workgroup on geotechnical BIM (incl. University of Bologna and University of Naples Federico II). Been in contact with Bob Bachus for a while. What is the best way to contribute to the project? Maybe we could work on some additional testing, such as flat dilatometer (DMT)? Best Giacomo — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#7>, or mute the thread<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AZI-CSDDiP9OWrDTa7Lgm5WnpzYeaqlhks5vOWo-gaJpZM4a_l8D>.

[jackmazzoni]

Sure. Work email: [email protected] My LinkedIn page for further reference: https://www.linkedin.com/in/giacomo-mazzoni-7b8b4241 Best Jack Il giorno mer 20 feb 2019, 18:48 AC107 <[email protected]> ha scritto:

…

Jack, can you send me some contact information directly so I can add you to a DIGGS contact list? ***@***.******@***.***> — Allen Cadden / Principal From: Jack Mazzoni ***@***.***> Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2019 9:42 AM To: DIGGSml/diggs-schema ***@***.***> Cc: Subscribed ***@***.***> Subject: [DIGGSml/diggs-schema] Contribution from Italian workgroup on geotechnical BIM (#7) Great job so far! I'm currently leading an Italian workgroup on geotechnical BIM (incl. University of Bologna and University of Naples Federico II). Been in contact with Bob Bachus for a while. What is the best way to contribute to the project? Maybe we could work on some additional testing, such as flat dilatometer (DMT)? Best Giacomo — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub< #7>, or mute the thread< https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AZI-CSDDiP9OWrDTa7Lgm5WnpzYeaqlhks5vOWo-gaJpZM4a_l8D>. — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#7 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AoYDSDnGvpApdNyr6IzxzusTk-PLt0pFks5vPYplgaJpZM4a_l8D> .

[dponti]

Hi Jack - welcome and thank you for contributing!

Scott Deaton has worked fairly extensively on implementing Diggs' CPT structure (StaticConePenetrationTest), and he can probably assist you better than I in regards to that test, but there's been little work done to validate Diggs' DMT structure (FlatPlateDilatometerTest) so we'd appreciate your feedback.

In addition to properties tied directly to the procedure, the FlatPlateDilatometer test produces a number of test results defined outside of the schema that are used as values for the propertyClass property within the Test object itself. Those property class codes are:

a_pressure
b_pressure
c_pressure
coef_consolidation_horiz
coef_earth_pressure
constrained_vert_modulus
dilatometer_modulus
dmt_tip_bearing
effective_stress_vertical
pore_pressure_equil
pore_pressure_est
material_index
horiz_stress_index
overconsolidation_ratio
p0_reading
p1_reading
p2_reading
friction_angle_peak
shear_strength_undrained_residual
friction_angle_residual
shear_strength_undrained
soil_type
thrust
unit_weight
vertical_stress_total

These values are defined in a test property dictionary that we're working on and will be posted shortly. Your comments on these resuls would be appreciated (eg. are these appropriate - do we need to add others, etc.)

[sdeaton75]

Jack, As Dan suggested I have worked with the CPT structure quite extensively and while doing that we also did review the DMT structure. Since we were able to get the CPT structure to work, we knew we could get the DMT structure to work in our software. Certainly any feedback or suggestions are appreciated on either the CPT or DMT! Regards,

…

-Scott L. Deaton, Ph.D. President Listen to Dataforensics on Business Radio X<http://www.dataforensics.net/video/Dataforensics_Radio_X.mp3>. #MakeYourDataGreatAgain. Dataforensics, LLC 2310 Parklake Drive Suite 525 Atlanta, GA 30345 Tel: [phone] Fax: [phone] www.dataforensics.net<http://www.dataforensics.net/> From: dponti <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, March 1, 2019 12:26 PM To: DIGGSml/diggs-schema <[email protected]> Cc: Subscribed <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [DIGGSml/diggs-schema] Contribution from Italian workgroup on geotechnical BIM (#7) Hi Jack - welcome and thank you for contributing! Scott Deaton has worked fairly extensively on implementing Diggs' CPT structure (StaticConePenetrationTest), and he can probably assist you better than I in regards to that test, but there's been little work done to validate Diggs' DMT structure (FlatPlateDilatometerTest) so we'd appreciate your feedback. In addition to properties tied directly to the procedure, the FlatPlateDilatometer test produces a number of test results defined outside of the schema that are used as values for the propertyClass property within the Test object itself. Those property class codes are: a_pressure b_pressure c_pressure coef_consolidation_horiz coef_earth_pressure constrained_vert_modulus dilatometer_modulus dmt_tip_bearing effective_stress_vertical pore_pressure_equil pore_pressure_est material_index horiz_stress_index overconsolidation_ratio p0_reading p1_reading p2_reading friction_angle_peak shear_strength_undrained_residual friction_angle_residual shear_strength_undrained soil_type thrust unit_weight vertical_stress_total These values are defined in a test property dictionary that we're working on and will be posted shortly. Your comments on these resuls would be appreciated (eg. are these appropriate - do we need to add others, etc.) — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#7 (comment)>, or mute the thread<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACTRlF8tUgtpXBTuCZJK_A5b47rxa7pkks5vSWLBgaJpZM4a_l8D>.

[jackmazzoni]

Hi Dan, Scott,

Thanks for your feedback.
DMT property class codes looks good as it is, again great job!

out-of-schema propertyClass looks promising for geophysics as well (which is difficult to exchange as "purely factual data") . Are you working on geophysical test procedures too? It might be another possible field of contribution, starting from SCPT and SDMT.

[dponti]

Check out the WirelineLog element in the Geotechnical schema. It is meant to be the procedure for downhole geophysical measurements or for core loggers. We have defined a number of propertyClass codes for this procedure (eg. natural gamma, resistivity, spontaneous potential, etc.) but others can and should be added.

[hbopuri]

We are currently reviewing DIGGS schema with .NET serializations and SQL Azure. Our firm is heavily in to geotechnical applications. I will keep posting any of my finding over here.