Arbitrary code concealment about luyten

[deathmarine]

I'm concerned about the exploit and who uses what tools however as Luyten only displays what Procyon spits out, I can't and wouldn't implement a change from within Luyten.

[EvelynSubarrow]

Fair enough. I did fork Luyten and implement an incredibly hackish JavaP bytecode mode, but the code is pretty horrible. In principle though, what would your thoughts be on expanding Luyten to encompass other disassembly tools?

[deathmarine]

I did see your fork, as I hate executing external applications within code, it is functional. With that in mind I have always been willing to utilize other tools (Luyten's predecessor used fernflower), hell, I've thought about going as far as to make comparable diffs between decompilers however time... time is always of the essences.

[EvelynSubarrow]

Time sucks

[EvelynSubarrow]

I say this, but I do have a lot of time on my hands...