Analyzer issue resolving two extensions in same library on same type, cross-referencing private getter about sdk

[bwilkerson]

Can you provide us with a (preferably minimal) reproduction case?

[busslina]

Can you provide us with a (preferably minimal) reproduction case?

Sure:

Top level extension:

extension TCallbackQueryBaseExtension on TCallbackQuery {
  String get _urlAnswerInlineQuery => '/answerInlineQuery';

  /// [API: answercallbackquery](https://core.telegram.org/bots/api#answercallbackquery)
  ///
  /// Send answers to callback queries sent from [inline keyboards](https://core.telegram.org/bots/features#inline-keyboards).
  ///
  /// [text] Text of the notification. If not specified, nothing will be shown to the user, 0-200 characters.
  ///
  /// [showAlert] If True, an alert will be shown by the client instead of a notification at the top of the chat screen. Defaults to false.
  ///
  /// [url] URL that will be opened by the user's client.
  ///
  /// [cacheTime]  	The maximum amount of time in seconds that the result of the callback query may be cached client-side. Telegram apps will support caching starting in version 3.14. Defaults to 0.
  Future<Ret<TMessage, TelegramError>> answerCallbackQueryBase({
    required Lock lock,
    required Dio httpClient,
    String? text,
    bool? showAlert,
    String? url,
    int? cacheTime,
  }) =>

      // Lock mode
      lock.synchronized(() async {
        final res = await handleResponse(
          httpClient.post(
            _urlAnswerInlineQuery,
            data: {
              'callback_query_id': id,
              if (text != null) 'text': text,
              if (showAlert != null) 'show_alert': showAlert,
              if (cacheTime != null) 'cache_time': cacheTime,
            },
          ),
        );

        // final data = res.response.data;
        // final success = res.statusCode == 200 && data['ok'] == true;

        debug(
            'answerCallbackQueryBase() -- ${res.statusCode} -- ${res.response.data}');

        throw ('Not implemented');

        // return Ret(
        //   success: success,
        //   value: success ? TMessage.fromJson(data['result']) : null,
        //   errMessage: 'Unknown error -- ${res.response.data}',
        //   errValue: success ? null : TelegramError.uknownError,
        // );
      });
}

Other extension:

extension TCallbackQueryExtension on TCallbackQuery {
  TelegramModule get _module => cc.read(telegramModuleCapsule);

  TelegramBotV2 get _bot => _module.bot;

  Future<Ret<TMessage, TelegramError>> answerCallbackQueryN({
    String? text,
    bool? showAlert,
    String? url,
    int? cacheTime,
  }) {
    final bot = _bot;

    return bot.lock.synchronized(() async {
      final res = await handleResponse(
        bot.httpClient.post(
          _urlAnswerInlineQuery,
          data: {
            'callback_query_id': id,
            if (text != null) 'text': text,
            if (showAlert != null) 'show_alert': showAlert,
            if (cacheTime != null) 'cache_time': cacheTime,
          },
        ),
      );

      // final data = res.response.data;
      // final success = res.statusCode == 200 && data['ok'] == true;

      debug(
          'answerCallbackQueryN() -- ${res.statusCode} -- ${res.response.data}');

      throw ('Not implemented');
    });
  }
}

You can see that the second extension uses a private field (_urlAnswerInlineQuery ) of the first extension. This fails at compile time but not at analysis time. (This is what I show in the demo video)

[bwilkerson]

Are the two extensions defined in different libraries? (I'm guessing the answer is yes, but want to be sure.)

[busslina]

Are the two extensions defined in different libraries? (I'm guessing the answer is yes, but want to be sure.)

Yes. I'm using a VSCode workspace that includes both libraries