Remove eex_html dep? about raxx

[CrowdHailer]

Agreed.

It was on a todo list of mine somewhere as I was in the process of removing dependencies over the last few releases.

Just as a counter point EExHTML is a very small dependency. Will escaping even this small piece require a general purpose html escape function, i.e. very similar to the one in EExHTML

[lasseebert]

One could also argue that a redirect with a HTML body is not in the scope of Raxx after Raxx.View has been extracted (I guess to make Raxx more general purpose?).

Perhaps it would be an idea to change redirect/2 to not include a body by default, but to make it configurable to do so. Something like this:

@spec redirect(String.t(), status: status, body: String.t(), content_type: String.t()) :: Raxx.Response.t()
def redirect(url, opts \\ []) do
  status = Keyword.get(opts, :status, :see_other)

  response = status |> response() |> set_header("location", url)

  case Keyword.fetch(opts, :body) do
    {:ok, body} ->
      content_type = Keyword.fetch!(opts, :content_type)

      response
      |> set_header("content-type", content_type)
      |> set_body(body)

    :error ->
      response
  end
end

[CrowdHailer]

Good answer, because it's fair enough to point out that the HTML body is useless if creating an API service.

[lasseebert]

I can make a PR if you'd like that :)

[CrowdHailer]

That would be lovely 👍