Support for rfc8323 (CoAP over TCP) about coap-rs

[Covertness]

I will consider to implement it in the future. Beside, any pr about it will be appreciated.

[Covertness]

Hello @Covertness,

I apologise for being busy. I think it is better to see with someone else to do this contribution.

It's fine

[Covertness]

Good idea. But I think it need a long time.

[joemag1]

The trickiest part of TCP rfc is a different wire/serialization protocol. Beyond tat, it’s relatively close to existing library.

…

On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 4:00 AM Covertness ***@***.***> wrote: Good idea. But I think it need a long time. — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#33 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/APu4MsP6FluwWQkE09-w67tiObTLCYcPks5vGvHJgaJpZM4aRZEa> .

[StEvUgnIn]

I'm in!

[pranav-bhatt]

Hi! Has there been any progress on this front?

[StEvUgnIn]

Studies are going crazy now.. I believe it is feasible but that we could focus on more mature issues

[pengliaoye]

any progress?

[Covertness]

any progress?

Still not implement. Do you have any interest in it ?

[StEvUgnIn]

Hello @Covertness,

I apologise for being busy. I think it is better to see with someone else to do this contribution.