errors found by cleanlab are mostly correct actually. about cleanlab

[NLPpupil]

�I figured out the reason.

The reason why "errors found by cleanlab are mostly correct" is that my data is almost clean !

If I randomly replace 10% of the label with an incorrect label, and check the outputs of ordered_label_errors = get_noise_indices(), I found that that 97% of the top 100 instances are really noises and only 9% of the last 100 instances are noises!

Thank your for your excellent work.

[cgnorthcutt]

Hi @NLPpupil . Can you please share (1) examples of your psx, and matching s, (2) how you computer psx, and (3) a minimum working example of your code?

[NLPpupil]

@cgnorthcutt Thank you, showing you the examples and code is a bother for you. I will double check first.

[NLPpupil]

Hi @cgnorthcutt , could you please tell me how to use cleanlab.models.fasttext.py to find label errors in details? I have a train file which is of fasttext format and I want to find the labels errors in the train file. Thank you very much .

[cgnorthcutt]

Hi @NLPpupil . Create an instance of the object model = FastTextClassifier. Then use the same approach as any other model: https://github.com/cgnorthcutt/cleanlab#learning-with-noisy-labels-in-3-lines-of-code

[NLPpupil]

I tried, but the model trained is just like the normal model trained by fasttext command line.Below is my code:
model = cleanft.FastTextClassifier(train_data_fn='train.txt',test_data_fn='test.txt',kwargs_train_supervised={'dim':200,'epoch':10,'minCount':5,'wordNgrams':3}) model.fit() predicted_test_labels = model.predict(train_data=False)

[cgnorthcutt]

Please provide the full error stack. Also cleanlab does not have a cleanft.