ifort 15.0 does not yet support F2008 syntax about fexception

[citibeth]

Tom,

Where am I doing that?

Also note that I NEED help on the Fortran stuff, especially converting C
string to Fortran. The c_f_string_ptr module I pulled from somewhere else,
but it is not solving my problem.

-- Bob

On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 4:08 PM, tclune [email protected] wrote:

The following is new syntax in F2008:

type (integer)

It is available in some compilers, but not others. Recommend using F2003
syntax for portability.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#5 (comment).

[tclune]

On May 11, 2015, at 4:13 PM, Bob Fischer [email protected] wrote:

Tom,

Where am I doing that?

E.g. line 85 in slib/fexception_f.F90:

type(logical) :: try

Also note that I NEED help on the Fortran stuff, especially converting C
string to Fortran. The c_f_string_ptr module I pulled from somewhere else,
but it is not solving my problem.

No problem. I’ve done the reverse on multiple occasions. Should be easy.

Unfortunately, I think robustness will require the string to be copied. OTOH, performance should not be an issue for these use cases.

• Tom

-- Bob

On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 4:08 PM, tclune [email protected] wrote:

The following is new syntax in F2008:

type (integer)

It is available in some compilers, but not others. Recommend using F2003
syntax for portability.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#5 (comment).

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

Thomas Clune, Ph. D. [email protected]
Head ASTG,Code 606
NASA GSFC
MS 610.8 B33-C128
Greenbelt, MD 20771
301-286-4635

[citibeth]

Thanks, removed it.
-- Bob

On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 4:17 PM, tclune [email protected] wrote:

On May 11, 2015, at 4:13 PM, Bob Fischer [email protected] wrote:

Tom,

Where am I doing that?

E.g. line 85 in slib/fexception_f.F90:

type(logical) :: try

Also note that I NEED help on the Fortran stuff, especially converting C
string to Fortran. The c_f_string_ptr module I pulled from somewhere
else,
but it is not solving my problem.

No problem. I’ve done the reverse on multiple occasions. Should be easy.

Unfortunately, I think robustness will require the string to be copied.
OTOH, performance should not be an issue for these use cases.

• Tom

-- Bob

On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 4:08 PM, tclune [email protected]
wrote:

The following is new syntax in F2008:

type (integer)

It is available in some compilers, but not others. Recommend using
F2003
syntax for portability.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
<#5 (comment)
.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

Thomas Clune, Ph. D. [email protected]
Head ASTG,Code 606
NASA GSFC
MS 610.8 B33-C128
Greenbelt, MD 20771
301-286-4635

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#5 (comment).