Creating / Merging Interfaces Fail with DCNM ver 10.5(1) about ansible-dcnm

[Tessier-Ashp001]

Update:

I think ansible is sending the following in the data field of the POST request (which is built from .ansible/collections/ansible_collections/cisco/dcnm/plugins/modules/dcnm_interface.py):

{
  "policy": "int_loopback_11_1",
  "interfaces": [
    {"interfaceType": "INTERFACE_LOOPBACK",
      "nvPairs": {
      "ROUTE_MAP_TAG": "",
      "CONF": "no shutdown",
      "IP": "99.99.99.99",
      "V6IP": "",
      "INTF_VRF": "",
      "ADMIN_STATE": "true",
      "INTF_NAME": "Loopback95",
      "DESC": "loopback interface 95 configuration"
      },
      "ifName": "Loopback95",
      "serialNumber": "SDDSFOSEF4",
      "fabricName": "my-fabric"}
      ],
      "skipResourceCheck": "true"
}

From the latest DCNM API documentation, what is should look like is:

{
  "policy": "int_loopback_11_1",
  "interfaceType": "INTERFACE_LOOPBACK",
  "interfaces": [
    {
      "serialNumber": "SDDSFOSEF4",
      "ifName": "Loopback95",
      "nvPairs": {
      "ROUTE_MAP_TAG": "",
      "CONF": "no shutdown",
      "IP": "99.99.99.99",
      "V6IP": "",
      "INTF_VRF": "",
      "ADMIN_STATE": "true",
      "INTF_NAME": "Loopback95",
      "DESC": "loopback interface 95 configuration"
      }
    }
  ]
}

[Tessier-Ashp001]

resolved in develop branch...

[mikewiebe]

@Tessier-Ashp001 Thanks for opening this issue. Just for clarification, were you testing with the latest release version from Ansible galaxy but then discovered that this is resolved in the develop branch?

[Tessier-Ashp001]

Hi @mikewiebe That's it exactly. Ansible Galaxy gave me the 1.0.0 version I think, which looks to be from last September. So I just reinstalled the collection specifying the develop branch this time. It's working fine now.

Thanks!