valid glTF fails to load in CesiumJS about cesium

[javagl]

Probably a duplicate of #10284 : Sparse accessors are simply not supported.

(This is also indicated by the ❌ in the "Cesium.js 116" column of the "Simple Sparse Accessor" row of the table in https://github.com/cx20/gltf-test : This is currently rendered without the sparse substitution...)

The example here adds Draco compression, and the crash is caused by the _BATCHID attribute, which is sparse and not covered by draco, because it only contains 0s anyhow. So there are a few things coming together that cause the lack of sparse accessor support to wreak havoc in this case. Maybe the crash could easily be avoided even without full sparse accessor support (and only cause a warning or so...)...

[mramato]

@javagl I agree that the way CesiumJS is failing here is not very useful and a clear error message or warning about lack of sparse accessors would be the least we could do. But it definitely bugs me that there is part of the glTF standard we seem to not support, especially since tools like gltf-transform's optimize function produces sparse accessors where applicable.

@ggetz @lilleyse What is the level of effort to support them?

[ggetz]

Closing in favor of #10284 to keep discussion in one place...