Design/spec discussion about cache-handler

[sillygod]

Hi, recently, I hack and migrate https://github.com/nicolasazrak/caddy-cache to be consistent with caddy 2 architecture and make it supports in-memory backend.

Here is the repo: https://github.com/sillygod/cdp-cache. Actually, I am not familiar with the mechanism of cache-control (there are so many RFC about it) and not totally understand the structure of caddy2. I have just touched caddy2 and https://github.com/nicolasazrak/caddy-cache for one week and more. Therefore, the code of my repo may be a little messy and not use caddy2's APIs so precisely.

Just to clarify, I just want to share my result and I hope this repo can give other people some inspiration or someone can give me any advice to help the cache function more stable and production-ready.

Finally, thank for the awesome work of caddy2 and nicolasazrak's https://github.com/nicolasazrak/caddy-cache

[mholt]

Cool. It would probably be best if we have just one cache handler for v2 rather than multiple, unless they do very different things / have very different approaches that would benefit different users.

But I'm thinking it's quite possible to have just one and satisfy most use cases.

Any interest in combining the two? This cache handler is a distributed cache which is important for a lot of customers I've talked to: they have too much to cache to fit in memory on one machine, and they have a cluster of Caddy instances deployed, so the distributed cache is essential: it just needs some finishing.

[francislavoie]

@urlund just in case it wasn't clear, this module is functional, just not feature complete. You can use it right now! See link to an example in the README: https://github.com/caddyserver/cache-handler#example-configuration

[urlund]

@francislavoie I see, may I suggest that you prioritize a "purge" feature then? :)

[sillygod]

I agree with you on this point. I would like to combine these two repos. However, I am working on my repo to support my company's requirements so It will be changed frequently (ex. the architecture, features, and more). That means it not stable now.

The advantage to keep working on my repo is I can totally control it :) Maybe it's not a good timing to merge them. :(

[mholt]

@abiosoft If you're interested in working on this repo, consider checking @sillygod's implementation for ideas and real business requirements - might be helpful.

[urlund]

Hi, I'm new to Caddy, and I really love the idea of a cache module build in, and just wanted to give you guys some 👏
Hopefully someone will take lead, and get this project running 💪