Not all of a procedures's participants are "device"s. about bluebutton.js

[blacktm]

A few things. <participant> is mapped to device, from your earlier suggestion. This is what I have in bb.js:

// participant => device
el = entry.tag('participant').tag('code');
var device_name = el.attr('displayName'),
    device_code = el.attr('code'),
    device_code_system = el.attr('codeSystem');

Designed to parse:

<participant typeCode="LOC">
  <participantRole classCode="SDLOC">
    <templateId root="2.16.840.1.113883.10.20.22.4.32"/>
    <!-- Service Delivery Location template -->
    <code code="GACH" codeSystem="2.16.840.1.113883.5.111" codeSystemName="HL7 RoleCode" displayName="General Acute Care Hospital"/>

Instead of grabbing the participant tag, I should grab by templateId? That would look something like this (a snippet from problems):

el = entry.template('2.16.840.1.113883.10.20.22.4.4').tag('code');
var name = el.attr('displayName'),
    code = el.attr('code'),
    code_system = el.attr('codeSystem');

[jmandel]

Yes -- going on participant is picking up not only devices, but also service delivery locations. (Ideally you'd define the entire path segment, e.g. participant/participantRole/templateId[@root="..."]/../code" which could make the behavior more predictable.)

[thetylerhayes]

FWIW we already do something similar to this in the C32 results parser: https://github.com/blue-button/bluebutton.js/blob/master/lib/parsers/c32/results.js#L36:

... 
// sometimes results organizers contain non-results. we only want tests
    if (observation.template('2.16.840.1.113883.10.20.1.31').val()) {
        var date = parseDate(observation.tag('effectiveTime').attr('value'));
...

So some sorta kinda precedent exists.

[sankarravi]

Yep, I have a fix for this on https://github.com/blue-button/bluebutton.js/pull/127/files#diff-e8efe13f6db4f401b317888b6d6cc9f4R39. Working on getting that PR ready for merge.

[norlowski]

Was this merged into master? I still see the above code with "participant => device".

Is the example @jmandel mentioned just a data problem in the official example ccda?

[sankarravi]

@norlowski The code on master looks like this:

    // participant => device
    el = entry.template('2.16.840.1.113883.10.20.22.4.37').tag('code');
    var device_name = el.attr('displayName'),
        device_code = el.attr('code'),
        device_code_system = el.attr('codeSystem');

So it now looks specifically for a tag that identifies a device. This should mean that only actual devices get parsed as devices. You can see in 79042f5#diff-46f39fe99505a71da1d296e1f8f3969eR640 that Josh's specific example is no longer parsed as a device (or technically that the tests, which pass, had to adjust for that expectation)

[norlowski]

Thanks for the updates!