feature request: Provide aarch64 docker images about autokuma

[BigBoot]

Small update, I just built a aarch64 image locally and everything seems to work fine, that said I won't be able to provide official builds unless/until GitHub rolls out aarch64 to everyone.

[BigBoot]

I've added qemu based aarch64 builds, unfortunately this increases build time from ~7 minutes to ~60 so I'll only build these on tags. Additionally they will remain experimental for the time being. There is a test build available here: https://github.com/BigBoot/AutoKuma/pkgs/container/autokuma/215277216?tag=sha-1b4bdf8

[BigBoot]

I'm not sure, this looks more like a general Docker Swarm problem, are you able to run the container using plain docker on the node to see potential problems?

[schmierlappe]

with local docker compose file I get this

[+] Running 0/1
⠏ autokuma Pulling 0.9s
no matching manifest for linux/arm64/v8 in the manifest list entries

tried on a rpi4

[BigBoot]

Yes I currently don't provide arm images, you would need to build the image from source in that case and arm support is untested

[schmierlappe]

could be docker hub an alternative?

[schmierlappe]

there I found this one

https://hub.docker.com/r/jasonmc1993/autokuma-arm

[mmospanenko]

yeah, arm64 is very important, we have whole infrastructure on arm (ampere)

[mmospanenko]

Thank you, only for major releases will be enough I think)

yes, it could be base image related, try with different distros - debian slim, alpine, etc. I have similar behavior on my project (python, ssl related things...), it depends on build process for dependencies, os related deps, etc.