Selection criteria for occurrences about natagora-occurrences

[LouisNatagora]

@peterdesmet Yes observations.be, waarnemingen.be and waarneming.nl share the same species list. And yes a status for Belgium for each species is indicated for each species. O.K. we won't use status within province.

[LouisNatagora]

To my eyes species of the category 1b are native. They should not be included.

[LouisNatagora]

About point 2:
The majority of species only have one status for the whole Belgium. Only some of them have a status at province level that differs from the country one.

So, even if the option one is not true, one can filter on this information when it's available.

[peterdesmet]

@LouisNatagora I assume observation.be, waarnemingen.be, and waarneming.nl share the same species list? Can you confirm that?

If so, for step 1: the status of the species in Belgium is indicated in that list. You'll need to select the species with the status naturalized, naturalizing, exotic, or incidental import. There is not necessarily a need to filter further on the status within a province.

@karingielen @kristijnswinnen, can you confirm this is the way this is done for publishing non-native occurrences from waarnemingen.be?

[peterdesmet]

Perfect! Than filter 1 will be exactly the same as Natuurpunt uses for publishing https://doi.org/10.15468/smdvdo and https://doi.org/10.15468/k2aiak

[LienReyserhove]

Sorry, my mistake, I misinterpreted the data, I was confused between the status of the population within the country/region and the status of the observation itself (presence in walloon region). So yes, of course the status for Belgium can be used