Insert agility object anywhere on the DOM about agility

[individual11]

I thought you could. For instance, I built a test where I put it in the middle of my content like this:

$$.document.append(list, $('#content'));

Couldn't you do a similar selector with an ID or class in your table?

[quartzo]

Let's say you have:

<table>
  <tr><td>1</td><tr>
  <tr><td>3</td><tr>
</table>

Now I want to put this in the middle:

<tr><td>2</td><tr>

Using jQuery I could use:

$('tr:eq(0)').after('<tr><td>2</td></tr>');

[individual11]

Give this a try:

<table>
   <tr><td>1</td></tr>
   <tr><td>3</td></tr>
</table>

var test = $$({}, '<td>2</td>');
$$.document.append(test, $('<tr />').insertAfter('table tr:first'));

[quartzo]

I can only do that because in this case the "tr" has only one "td". :-)
I will have to complicate the example:

<tr><td>2</td><td>Product2</td></tr>

[individual11]

haha.. now I see it's just a cat and mouse game. For that, unless I miss something, you would change it in your view. Something like this:

<table>
   <tr><td>1</td><td>Product1</td></tr>
   <tr><td>3</td><td>Product3</td></tr>
</table>

var test = $$({productID:0, productName:''}, '<td data-bind="productID" /><td data-bind="productName" />');
var myTest = $$(test, {productID:2, productName:'Product2'})
$$.document.append(myTest, $('<tr />').insertAfter('table tr:first'));

[quartzo]

The documentation says clearly:

// INVALID CODE!! (more than one root elements)
var obj = $$({}, '<div>hey there</div> <button>OK</button>');
$$.document.append(obj);

[individual11]

Yeah, you're right. It doesn't throw an error on any of my tests, but would probably freak out if you start doing anything heavy with the controller. I was more or less using it like a template. The problem is you can't select empty space and pass it as as the "selector" to put the root element. That's why I halfed it by creating the root element on the fly, but the controller won't recognize that.

Probably would be nicer if you could call the append method directly on a JQuery object, then it wouldn't matter.

[arturadib]

Hey guys, thanks for the brainstorming here. For completeness, I think it makes sense to have before() and after() methods. jQuery needed it, and we'll probably need it quite a bit too.

I've merged Fabio's (@quartzo) work, added some unit tests, and added a few touch-ups.

Thanks!