use more semantic versioning about appserver

[wagnert]

Hi,

thanks for your feedback. You point to our roadmap, right? You're right, we've to refactor the roadmap and we'll do that during the next weeks. Actually we're migrating our project management to JIRA. After finished the migration we'll refactor the roadmap and publish it on JIRA. If you're interested and found the time, we'll happy if you've a suggestion how the roadmap should look like.

Tim

[wick-ed]

Hi @Flyingmana ,

thanks for your (admittedly kind of overlooked) input.
We currently discussed our versioning strategy and came up with the following.
What are your thoughts on it?

I would close this issue in regards to the new concept which will take effect as soon as the milestone is hit.

[Flyingmana]

sounds good for me :)
Maybe limit the term "breaking BACKWARDS COMPATIBILITY MUST increment the version" to only ARCHITECTURE and Major, as new features should not break them and bugfixes only in important cases(security, data loss)

[wick-ed]

You are right. This is better described within the glossary but I will change the misleading parts.

Thanks. :)

[wick-ed]

Made some changes.
http://docs.appserver.io/master/organisational/versioning.html