:subset (include-91), :example, :part/:subevent, :consist-of, and :employed-by about amr-guidelines

[nschneid]

Responding to questions from Claire:

Did we decide to bring back :subset? I thought this had been replaced by include-91? If so, can someone summarize the motivation for this?

I thought include-91 was the reification of :subset?

Should we standardize to a single term when a subset is mentioned but the subset and superset are given two different labels? (e.g. latest quake in a series of tremors). If so, how do we decide which label to adopt?

The consensus annotation for that sentence has quake :time (late :degree most :compared-to tremor), which sidesteps that issue. But I guess "the quake, one in a series of tremors, ..." could be quake :subset-of (series :subset tremor) (effectively quake and tremors are both subsets of the same superset). Is that a good solution? Or would it be better to treat series and team the same way, using :consist-of? So quake :subset-of (series :consist-of tremor)?