obligate-01 about amr-guidelines

[nschneid]

Perhaps the reasoning was that ARG0 and ARG1 would only be used if an imposition of obligation by some party on some other party was salient, whereas if something was framed as a general requirement it would merely fall under ARG2.

That said, it's probably not terribly consistent in practice. From a release search I see both

I have to constantly make such comparisons to make sure it all works.
   
(o / obligate-01
        :ARG1 (i / i)
        :ARG2 (c / compare-01 ...))

and

I have to renew my car insurance every six months.
   
(o / obligate-01
        :ARG2 (r / renew-01
              :ARG0 (i / i)
              :ARG1 (i2 / insure-02 ...) ...))