... not legal ... but legal. about thinkpython2

[AllenDowney]

It's not a legal integer, but it is a legal expression.

I'm not sure I understand your suggestion. Can you say more about what
should be clarified?

On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 1:16 AM, Arya766 [email protected] wrote:

Inexpressively written:

Page 4, title no. 1.5, 2nd paragraph from the end.

Thanks

—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#20, or mute the
thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/ABy37b-HzbE_bW_1V9XN935lA19oaVjnks5qNiIegaJpZM4I5XaK
.

[Arya766]

Yes, it's not clear for those like me, whose maternal language is not English, and have all struggles of being a noob at Python. It would be way more comprehensible should you add the above said "expression".
Thanks again

[AllenDowney]

I understand. I wanted to, but at this point in the book, "expression" has
not been defined yet.

On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 11:12 PM, Arya766 [email protected] wrote:

Yes, it's not clear for those like me, whose maternal language is not
English, and have all struggles of a noob. It would be way more
comprehensible should you add the above said "expression".
Thanks again

—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#20 (comment),
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/ABy37UMEkeyFwiDJTlTx9YuOsFiYMLOiks5qOfmkgaJpZM4I5XaK
.

[Arya766]

Good point! Didn't notice that. Well, thank you for making it clear to me. And thanks for responding to questions like mine.

[Arya766]

Good point! Didn't notice that. Well, thank you for making it clear to me. And thanks for responding to questions like mine.