Production: Bigger summation sign about thinkpython2

[AllenDowney]

Now page 83

[kristenORM]

Allen, we've increased the size of the summation sign as shown here:

Does this look right, or does the size need to change more? And is this the only instance in the book? Our CSS team tweaked just this one, but can go to Tools for a global fix if the symbol should be larger across the board.

[AllenDowney]

That's better, but ideally k=0 should be below the summation and infinity
above.

[image: Inline image 2]
That is the only summation in the book, so no need for a global fix.

But when we get to Think DSP, we have some work to do!

On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 3:06 PM, kristenORM [email protected]
wrote:

Allen, we've increased the size of the summation sign as shown here:
[image: summation]
https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/1178372/10702397/77562de4-7997-11e5-8c3f-efd37f208007.png

Does this look right, or does the size need to change more? And is this
the only instance in the book? Our CSS team tweaked just this one, but can
go to Tools for a global fix if the symbol should be larger across the
board.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#12 (comment)
.

[kristenORM]

Here's the latest iteration: how does this look?

[AllenDowney]

Looks good.

If we have fine-grain control, I would reduce the stroke weight of the
Sigma and increase the space between the Sigma and k=0.

But it's fine.

On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 9:39 AM, kristenORM [email protected] wrote:

Here's the latest iteration: how does this look?
[image: summation_new]
https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/1178372/10910691/d2cfe924-820e-11e5-9e90-bcd21c24a72e.png

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#12 (comment)
.