Classification: add labels in confusion_matrix. about handson-ml2

[kashevg]

Hi, @ageron
Ok, I get it.
As for me, it's so unnatural to have TP in the right lower corner. I know, it's a common approach for confusion matrices to sort classes in ascending order, but for binary classification, IMHO, it's better to have "positive" at the beginning, the same order as in wiki
Thank you.

[ageron]

Hi @kashevg,

Thanks for your feedback. I suppose you are referring to figure 3-2?

I'm not sure what you mean by "TP stays for False and TN stays for True class"? In the example, we are building a "5-detector", so "positive" means it's a 5, and "negative" means it's not a 5. So a TP is an image that is correctly labeled as positive. The figure does show 5s correctly labeled as 5s in the lower right cell, and that's the cell labeled as TP, so frankly I don't see the problem.

Regarding the confusion matrix's orientation, I'm not sure there is any official standard for the order of the columns and rows. I just did a quick informal search on Google Image for "confusion matrix" and among the first 11 confusion matrices for binary classifiers, 6 have the TP in the top left, and 5 in the lower right. That's almost 50%.

Moreover, Scikit-Learn itself puts the TP in the lower right, as the following code demonstrates:

>>> from sklearn.metrics import confusion_matrix
>>> #               1 TN  2 FP   3 FN      4 TP
>>> confusion_matrix([0,  0, 0,  1, 1, 1,  1, 1, 1, 1], # y_true
...                  [0,  1, 1,  0, 0, 0,  1, 1, 1, 1]) # y_pred
...
array([[1, 2],
       [3, 4]])

I find this order quite natural, as it just follows the order of the classes (0=negative, 1=positive). This allows it to be consistent even when there are more classes.

I hope this helps!