Make methods treeshake-able about s

[adamhaile]

Yeah, exactly, this is a side-effect of making the main S export a function and attaching others to it, rather than S being a module. I've gone both ways on whether that was originally a good idea or not. The main issue that has kept things the way they are is that fixing it would be a breaking change for all S code. All usages of S(() => ...) would have to switch to something like S.comp(() => ...). So far, it hasn't felt like the small size savings are worth breaking everybody's code.

[luwes]

Ah yes, makes sense. Might indeed not be worth it then.

[marvinhagemeister]

What if we export S as the defsult export and make all others as a named one. I can make a PR if needed.