Simplify lifecycle definition for classes with init/cleanup method pair about izumi

[neko-kai]

@pshirshov
You may try evalTap for that:

Lifecycle.makeSimple[GMStorage] {
  new GMStorage.GMStorageImpl(config, hash)
 }(_ => ())
  .evalTap(_.init())

[pshirshov]

Still, I think that explicit support for a pair of methods would be a good addition

[neko-kai]

@pshirshov
When you have control of the implementation class you may use Lifecycle.Mutable for that:

class GMStorageImpl(config: StorageConfig, hash: GMHasher) extends GMStorage with Lifecycle.Mutable {
  def acquire: Unit = init()
  def release: Unit = ()
}

make[GMStorage].fromResource[GMStorageImpl]

And I've added Lifecycle.makeSimpleInit #1985 for cases where the implementation class is not controlled:

make[GMStorage].fromResource {
 (config: StorageConfig, hash: GMHasher) =>
   Lifecycle.makeSimpleInit(
     new GMStorageImpl(config, hash)
   )(_.init())(_ => ())
}